>Hi, George,
>
>Yes, you're absolutely right. The parameter received is actually something called a "Windows key code", and the significant ones are defined in some constants I found after digging around a little more in the documentation. Well, duh!
>
>OK, now that I know what they are, I can use them as is.
>
>Thanks for clearing up my misunderstanding.

No problem, Jim. Always glad to help out.

>I did find that Key Scan Code table. Its the same table in my very old (Copyright 1984)Assembly Language reference, which may be where it came from.

Figures. I must admit it looked awfully familar when I saw it to. You know that I'm an old "bithead" myself.:-)

>George, best wishes for the Holiday and a happy New Year.

The same to you and your's, Jim.