>>Hey Mike ... were you going to add something?
>
>Err, it wasn't in the plan, but I can dig through the foxcode.dbf that I use for my everyday work and see if it might be useful enough to put in the product. I do a lot of VFP OLE DB provider testing and COM server testing. Is there anything that you think I might have stock that would be useful for the average (or not-so-average) developer? For instance, I've got a ton of templates for COM servers that use IMPLEMENTS. I've also got stuff where "CRS" (create recordset) =

>Local oRs as "adodb.recordset"
>Local oConn as "adodb.connection"
>oRs = blah, blah, blah, etc.

>
>And then there's the template (or "script", as I believe IntelliSense calls it) that creates a template for a COM server, and also sets up a template for the COM methods to autmatically stick it in MTS/COM+. It's all pretty rough, but if there's enough hue and cry for it, I can bring it to the proper authorities for consideration.

I'd be interested in that stuff. I'm in the early design stages of a major n-tier application that will make use of ADO, COM+, and other good things. We'll have to write some VB components to get things started, but it will probably be a year before we have all current applications re-written, so we can use VFP for the Queued Components, LCE, etc then.


>
>But, no, I don't have the VB translator quite done yet. :-)

Now *that* would be interesting.