>>Even if it's still rough, I recommend that you guys ship as many of those as possible, perhaps in a separate DBF with a disclaimer about it being "test" code, as an example of ideas for extending code completion and Intellisense. That way, those who are interested in it can pull in those records, and yet you won't have to deal with tech support issues.
>
>I second that motion.

Okay, I'll bring it to the attention of those responsible for sticking such things in the product.