>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>Telling Mike that he doesn't 'get it' because he is too young is failing to address the question, and also implies that anyone your age would agree with all of your assertions, which is total hogwash.
>>
>>Hi Erik,
>>
>>Doesn't disprove it either...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>C'mon Doug!
>
>You can't prove or disprove negatives and generalities.
>
>In order to disprove it you only need one person of about your age that does not agree with all of your assertions. There are b>many here that do not, starting with myself. So Erik is right, it's total hogwash.

Alex,

Well, if this were a laboratory I'd tend to agree with you. However, since I cannot prove anything I did yesterday via the scientific method I guess it didn't exist. <g> Actually, I'd say that the scientific method is flawed as it cannot be used in some cases particularly time-based stuff like personal experiences. Personal experience is IMO perfectly acceptable as long as you understand the limitations and in that case I'd give you 1/2 point <g> as it can still go both ways in many cases. However the aggregation of personal experience, which is what I was doing in my case, seems perfectly acceptable in this case.

Regardless, thanks for the thoughts...