>Well, for starters try http://search.mediaresearch.org andn please don't just dismiss them since they tend to be conservative. Look at their numbers.

Jeez, talk about conservative bias, Doug. I loved this:

http://www.mediaresearch.org/columns/newscol/col20001219.html

"The big winner for the Democrats was Hillary. Say what you will about her dishonesty, her unethical behavior, and her illegal activities – have I covered the bases?"

Some wonderful, objective reporting there. Give me a break. They don't tend to be conservative... they are conservative, and totaly without any objectivity. I found two highly negative pieces on Democrats right off the bat. Care to point out some that are negative toward Republicans?

>Here';s a direct link though I'm not sure it'll pass the parser test. <g>
>
>http://search.mediaresearch.org/search/search.asp?PageType=GetDoc&CurrentQuery=view1+All+4033+0++%28%28Drudge%29%20AND%2019871001%3C%3DDate%3C%3D20001231%29%20AND%20Search%3Dyes&OldQuery=simplesearch+view1+All+25+0++%28%28Drudge%29+AND+19871001<=Date<=20001231%29+AND+Search=yes&Original=SearchRoot&SiteName=MRC
>
>Just do a search on 'Drudge' and take the first story - dated January 8
>
>Look for:
>
>"From the January 1998 MediaWatch
>
>Page Eight
>ABC Decries Reckless Internet News
>
>Casting the First Stone"

What numbers? You said look at the numbers. There are no numbers. This is one story about Nightline refusing to apologize for a story done back in 1991.