Hi,

Thanks for your help concerning this Foxpro problem under NT.

When you mention "relocate your program to VFP 6.0", do you mean to rewrite it?

If you mean to recompile the source code under VFP 6.0, I did not know it could be done.
o Is it complicate to do?
o That must give bizarre results. No?
o Is there any retouch to do?

Réal

>Hi !
>1) Yes, 32 FOXPROX will be working very fast !
>2) But this version 2.5b have some bugs. So we use full version of the FoxPro
> and it work perfect (I know that it is not correct with copyright but
> MS will not fix it)
>3) Another way - more powerful - relocate your porgramm to VFP 6.0 - it will
> be working VERY fast !
>
>P.S. But I use second variant to customers who have not enough money. And in the Russia they have non-licenzed FoxPro...
>
>
>>Hi everyone,
>>
>>We have a french video club software used in Canada, France, Switzerland and Guadeloupe developped in Foxpro 2.5b for DOS. It works perfect under DOS only or DOS under Windows 95/98.
>>
>>One of my client moved this application from windows 95 to NT. He had no problem before. He just wanted more power. I believe he is the first one to do this with this software.
>>
>>But since he changed to NT he experiences some weird problems as;
>>o Internal consistency error
>>o File is in use
>>o Syntax error
>>
>>The program is one .APP run with FOXD250B.ESL and FOXD250B.ESO (16 BIT) in a multiuser (3 stations) environment.
>>
>>Do you think running in 32 bit with FOXPROX would make a difference?
>>
>>I'm just thinking of something important, since I did not made the installation, is this the kind of error we get when FOXD250B.ESL and FOXD250B.ESO are not set to READ ONLY ??? <=
>>
>>Is there any other 'secret' I should know about Foxpro running under NT ?
>>
>>Thanks in advance