Thanks for explaining that.


>As Alex says, Unfoxall does not "Respect" refox branding.
>
>No software method is secure as the code can always be "hexedited as evidenced by the number of so called "cracking" groups around. With the almost forgotten knowledge of assembler, ANY program can be cracked. Even hardware is of no help. In these times I feel there is no real use of protection when any protection can be circumvented.
>
>We have taken this approach and the only recourse is the courts!
>
>With refox and others the only thing that you try to protect is the source and maybe the idea.
>
>Cheers and Merry Xmas
>
>Bernard