Hi Jason,

I don't disagree with you there. However, the UT is mainly VFP with a few other forums, including Linux, thrown in for good measure. For people who haven't been exposed to Linux the posted Linux articles are probably of little interest. Certainly they won't be posting any Linux articles that they come across. It's up to the readers and contributors of this forum to post articles and increase the profile of Linux on the UT.

Regards,

Liam





>>I don't believe that there any deliberate anti-Linux bias on the part of the UT. If there is a shortage of Linux articles on the UT I think submitting articles for posting on the front page would be a more positive solution than taking the UT to task over it.
>
>I would like to believe that too. It's the wording of the headlines and the lack of followups that get to me. Is every single article that is posted submitted? I doubt it.
>When there's a MS follie, there is always a follow-up (and I'm sure they research it a bit too. If they don't they are stupid for blindly posting.)
>
>j