Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
More Rush Propaganda
Message
From
04/01/2001 11:05:28
 
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00457201
Message ID:
00459371
Views:
34
Chris,

Well, actually Jesus was pointing out that spiritual issues are much more important and long lasting than physical ones. I agree with that thought.

A modern day version might be: If drinking 'stumbles' you then stop drinking. If you have to walk by a liquor store to get home and that's causing you trouble - move.

Underneath all of this is that you are responsible for making the proper choices and should so do. I couldn't agree more.

I'll read through your other references and reply accordingly when I get a few minutes.

>I am having trouble with Mathew 5:28-29. I think it means I have to tear out both my eyes. That is going to seriously delay the project I am working on.
>
>These are also troubling:
>
>Ephesians 6:5-9
>Colossians 4:1
>Timothy 6:1-3
>
>>Well, if by 'literal' you mean I take the words on their face value - absolutely I take the OT literally. 100%
>>
>>Now that in no way precludes examining the Hebrew or Greek in the case of the Septuigent nor does it mean I stop thinking. King James 1611 English surely has a few archaic or no-longer-used definitions for example. A few of the newer translations are actually pretty good and I've found it helpful to compare them between themselves. There are two major sources for modern scripture. The Textus Receptus and Westcott & Hort. There are some differences between the Textus Receptus and the work done by Westcott & Hort. I suppose I'd be in the Textus Receptus camp more than the W&H camp. Many of the so-called modern tranlations rely more on W&H than the Received Text (Textus Receptus).
>>
>>The texts have stood solidly against over 2000 years of assaults so if you have a problem with any odf it I'd be more than happy to answer any question you have.
>>
>>>Are your standards the same for the NT?
>>>
>>
>>Yup.. I take the words on their face value, using the same examination standards as above. There is an absolutel wealth of information available actually.
>>
>>The problem Chris that many seem to have is that they confuse what others say about the Bible as opposed to what the Bible says just straight out.
Best,


DD

A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform