>>Well, that makes it kind of hard to support your arguments. < g >
>
>Not hardly. I see no need to support this arguement by trudging through CFRs to come up with code sections, parts and sub-parts. The fed gov't puts out thousands of pages of new and revised regs every month.

Thousands of pages for small businesses? Every month? I really find that hard to believe.

>>And you are sure this is going to save us money? You are sure that these vouchers are going to pay for housing? How do you determine what the voucher payment should be? Better yet, who decides it? It is definitely going to be different here in Louisville than in San Francisco, unless the market has totally hit the floor there in the past few days.
>
>Well I as a gov't HUD employee would certainly not redeem a voucher submitted by a grocery store. Obviously voucheres could only be accepted by apartment complexes, landlords or mortgage financial institutions. Give me a break. Are you saying welfare recipients do not get a larger stipend in SF than they do in Mayberry, RFD? Even gov't employees get locality adjustments in their salaries based on where their home office is.

No, what I meant was are you sure that the vouchers are going to cover the cost of housing.

And my point about the larger stipend in SF is that someone has to figure out all this stuff... the federal govt. maybe? So how are we saving money be doing this?