Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
FP2.6a/Mac & MacOS 8
Message
 
To
13/08/1997 13:39:56
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00042231
Message ID:
00046112
Views:
34
Jen,
I just sent you a private message - did not see your response here until after! Thanks for the input and your insights seem on the mark. I really appreciate your thoughts and sharing of your experience with 4D and FMP.

I have all but decided to stick with VFP/Mac for now and play the waiting game.

Best,
Bette


>>*******************
>We're running VFP3.0 on Mac and Win95 systems. We've had some (relatively minor) glitches where things that worked on one system didn't work quite the same on the other, but we've managed to put together a pretty neat bi-platform case tracking/phone log/diary system for the Insurance Liability Recovery group.
>
>Unfortunately we're being migrated to Wintel from Mac :>( so we'll be doing future development on Win95 PCs. The Mac is slower than the PC -- but the machines are physically slower too (PowerMac 6100/8100 vs Pentium 100/120s)
>
>Originally the company was using 4D and FileMaker Pro (FileBreaker is what it should be called)
>
>4D is a nightmare to work in -- I discovered I had to code reports as there is no "real" report generator. Producing forms is a pain as 4D has none of the tools for alignment and layouts that VFP has (align centers, space equally etc.) I also found it was very slow. 4D also has some quirks that make debugging and documentation difficult.
>
>FileMaker Pro is nice for quick and dirty flat file applications. I'm in the middle of designing a VFP replacement for a FileMaker database that was designed by amateurs. It's a nightmare -- no data validation tools, no serious programming/scripting tools. I use FileMaker for a number of personal apps -- because I'm the only one who uses them and I know I'm not putting in dud data!! However, it's not a serious tool for heavy duty apps.
>
>Stick with VFP -- it's by far the most heavy duty database engine. I like 3.0. I hope that the new Apple/M$ alliance will result in better support and for VFP on the Mac. I've not used 2.6, but 3.0 has worked very well for us so far. (I'm an old dBII, dBIII, Clipper, FoxBase programmer from way back)
>
>Of course letters to Apple and M$ commending the allianece will have no effect!!
>
>HTH
>Jen
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform