> >>>Now, Jen, if you keep being this serious (on this particular thread), you may disqualified from the "Funniest Signature". You may have to be relagated to "Most Philosophical," which may or may not be to your liking. Then again, I don't even know that Roxanne would consider such an award. I'll complete defer judgement to her, after all, she started this. >>> >>>Cheers, >>> >>>George >> >>Well I still crack up at Jen's signature because it reminds me of most of the end user requests I get for new projects! And most philisophical? heh heh... I think thats one of the side-effects of many long nights spent pouring over code, so maybe we got 2 valid nominations for one shining individual? >> >>=D) Rox > >Good point. But, Rox, you're in charge of this, so it's your decision. I certainly wouldn't object. > >As for side-effects, what side-effects? Other than generally speaking in terms most of the rest of the world can't understand, and the fact that before I can order anything in a restaurant, I first have view the menu in abstract terms, what side-effects are you talking about? > >George
(big laugh) So ok... Jen got 2 nominations. And regarding side effects, afraid I'm gonna plead the 5th on the grounds it might incriminate me. But do you think you could explain this natural instinct to view everything in abstract terms to my husband? He tends to think I "over-analyze everything".
=D)
Roxanne M. Seibert Independent Consultant, VFP MCP
