>>http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~MoreOnRemoteViews~VFP
>>
>
>I hope you don't rely too much on this link. It is riddled with inaccuracies...

What statements are inaccurate? Can you update the article with your counter-points?

>One does not need to rely soley on T-SQL. While you can, it is often not the best thing to do. VFP has a great DML - indepdendent of working with VFP cursors. VFP is very effective at crunching through ADO recordsets - as well as VFP cursors.

Whew! My client may want to change all this to T-SQL.

>Scaleability is also a relevant discussion in terms of maintenance. When your schema changes, RV's often break. I can see why RV's can work for you - since you are using Cold Fusion - a great product IMO. For ODBC-Based data connectivity - it is an ASP-Killer.

As may my stored procs. As far as Cold Fusion, I do not use it, although my client does. Bret Hobbs has incidated it does not work well with VFP COM objects. I would much prefer Web Connection.