Garrett

Yeah, well I wasn't exactly expressing myself in a fashion to endear myself to you, either. I'm sorry for that. I'd also like to make it clear that I do not think that there has been any impropriety on your part, especially since you do not have absolute control of the process.

IMHO we can agree that whatever has gone on before, in this period most MVPs and certainly the ones selected by you, are prolific technical contributors to the online community and the programme continues to improve.

The value of the award relies on transparency of process. IMHO it might be wise for somebody to create an editable page (on the WIKI?) with up-to-date MVP information so anybody can drop past and see what MVP's are up to and where they are hanging out.

It might also be good to publish how to nominate a MVP so that recipients of advice can contribute effectively and to remove any hint of secrecy.

Good luck to you, I'm behind schedule so I need to go and do some productive work now!

Regards

JR