Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
The 10K club
Message
 
To
10/01/2001 09:02:44
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00460931
Message ID:
00461884
Views:
18
Hi Tamar,

If we're going to get serious about it ...

FWIW, I agree with you - otherwise there are just too few cues in this medium.

Cheers,

Andrew

>>Hi Len,
>>
>>Don't you know that the smiley icon and the JOKE postscript are the on-line equivalent of the Laugh Track - the yanks would feel lost without them :)
>>
>
>Actually, I view the "< g >" as the on-line equivalent of the grin you'd see if we were talking face-to-face or hear if we were on the phone. That's because I see this kind of discussion as the equivalent of a conversation. Viewed that way, it makes sense to use it.
>
>OTOH, I get really annoyed about emoticons in books and magazines. In a publication, if it's not funny enough to stand by itself, take it out.
>
>Tamar


If we were to introduce Visual FoxBase+, would we be able to work from the dotNet Prompt?


From Top 22 Developer Responses to defects in Software
2. "It’s not a bug, it’s a feature."
1. "I thought I fixed that."


All my FoxTalk and other articles are available on my web site.


Unless specifically identified otherwise, anthing posted here is purely my opinion and may or may not reflect the policies or practices of Microsoft.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform