I agree 100%. I am hoping that VFP stays out of the CLR debacle because when it all crashes and burns next year (lol) VFP will emerge pristine :-)

OTOH, someone (maybe Calvin?) in Miami mentioned a MUCH more intriguing idea, and that is a WinCE version of VFP. Even if you have to remove backwards compatibity with FP and maybe DB events and stored procs, I think that would kick ass.


>If we could have both, IOW, VFP continues along the same course it's been on since MS got their hands on it (from a technical standpoint) and we got VFP.NET which was a CLR version of VFP that just supported what the CLR can handle, then that would be interesting. Unfortunately, if we got VFP.NET, I think development of regular VFP would stop just like it has for VB.