>>Are you talking about the ratings labels on music CDs, etc? I do not really call that censorship because that does not prohibit the distribution of the CDs.
>
>Wasn't that the goal of Tipper's power trip though? I don't remeber anymore.

If it was, then she was absolutely wrong.

>>As long as the ratings standards are established and published, then that is all consumers should expect. The decision would then be that of the consumer.
>
>And put graphitii all over covers? You woulnd't stick something like that on David (the statue, not df ;-) cause he's naked.

No, but then that would be rating the obvious which is frivolous. Rating what is not known by the consumer is not. A small rating symbol on the back cover is sufficient.