>>>
>It's pretty obvious that some of our FoxPro frameworks would fit nicely with .NET.
><<
>
>Why/How is it "pretty obvious"? Given that the application, data, and OO models are completely different, I don't see how it is obvious...
>
>< JVP >

Perhaps I used the wrong terminology. I could see some of the vendors porting their frameworks to .NET. Microsoft is finally providing full OOP support at a higher level than C++. Combine this with ADO, and you've got functionality and ease of use comparable to FoxPro. It just makes sense to me that framework vendors would widen their market by porting their products. Additionally, it would give developers an easier migration path to .NET if desired.

Then again, maybe I'm off base. There is the possibility that if .NET offers enough high-level services, another layer of abstraction would be pointless. What do you think?