Well there you go... It is a wrapper - implemented via a design pattern,

A subclass it is not....

Thanks for posting the wiki topic Larry....

< JVP >




>Check out this topic on the Wiki.
>
>>>I was just object to calling it a simple or classic wrapper, and was trying to defend against JVP's assertion's that:
>>>
>>>'this is nothing new'
>>
>>I looked at your code though didnt study or disect it like Nick did. Is it a new technique or what? It reminds me of principals taken from Doug Hennig's work in FoxTalk with passed parameters that don't exist yet in his Applications app and also his nTier design in CoDe magazine where a class may or may not be a com object.