I'd watch out when asking for help here. They tend to throw EVERYTHING at a symptom. You could loose your hair and be a que ball in no time. Poor kids.
>Once you get good at this doctering stuff....I have this rash on my side that I'd like you to take a look at.
>
>PF
>
>>Currently I work on a project started by Statisticians in 92. The hospital has an Acronym "ProGedd." I have renamed it Chernobyl. It is toxic by nature and has been designated for clean up / conversion over the next year or 2. At least it's not accounting!
>>
>>__Stephen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>There have been significant changes in Pro 6. There is definitely still legacy code, but they have made an attempt to start making things truely OOP. Unfortunately, they made a bigger mess of things in the process. :(
>>>
>>>SBT wasn't really a competitor of ACCPAC. Different markets. I must say that more things have been happening now that ACCPAC owns it than when SBT did. They're moving the product right along.
>>>
>>>Michelle
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I had to do the same for a former company back in 99. It took lots of time to evaluate that the mods. It took no time to figure out that SBT mave have put the code into VFP but it's the same old crap. (ver 5 experience)
>>>>
>>>>All data was still held in arrays for doing forms. Printing was still a nightmare, same old same old.
>>>>
>>>>Maybe in 6 it all changed? BWAHHHAAAA I cant see that ever happening. Well they were purchased, probably to let rot on the side so ACCPAC would have one less competitor?
>>>>
>>>>__Stephen
