>We are currently looking at limitations in Fox, I know what MS states but I need to know from experience what people think Fox can handle comfortably.
>
>Can anyone tell me what they think a Large Fox DB is (ie No. of Tables/Views etc etc.)

I draw the line around 200-300 tables/views at the max in a DBC, and usually somewhat smaller. Not really any performance problems, it's just awkward to work with anything larger.