>Yeah, you're saying that native VFP data commands would have to be mapped internally to system.data.ado.
Nope, thats not what I'm saying, and I agree, most solutions are a horrible idea. I'm saying that with the CLR, we'd have a native data access mechanism, it just woudln't be VFP DBFs. The syntax to me is really superficial at that level.
>Whether it can do the equivalent of macro expansion and the speed cost of that is another story.
Sounds like an overall theme with teh CLR *eg*
>I'd like to see an actual explanation somewhere. Let me know if you find one.
Ok, but I'm sure you've done alot more research than I have with all things .NET.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only