>>>>Take it easy, Nadya. We don't need to be indelicate about it. They will come in their own due time without undue pressure from us. The VFP community cannot afford to lose the good will of our most eminent contributors, and they will each have to weigh their personal decisions for themselves.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I've tried to keep my mouth shut about this, but I'm getting tired of the patronizing attitude and innuendo and the like. I don't know how others feel, but I would never sign something that says I might be willing to sign something in the future, especially in an online venue where my name might be abused. When there's a real letter, I'll read it and consider whether I'm willing to put my name to it. Until then, I'll wait. I doubt I'm the only one who feels this one.
>>>
>>Tamar,
>>
>>I'm with you too.
>>
>>BTW, it may have been me (GT) Nadya was referring to rather than you (TG).< g >
>
>Yep, I meant you, sorry, haven't thought about all reasons clearly...

No need to apologize, Nadya.

First, I really admire the enthusiam and comraderie that all this has generated. However, I'm at the point in my life where, I'll leave all the organizing trying to save the (Fox) world, and so on to others. (I did my turn more years ago than I care to admit< g >).

I don't know about Tamar, but I always had a devil of a time keeping articles I was writing for Advisor straight. There's a format to the file name that always caused me to have to look twice to make sure I was opening the right one. If I sent her a file named TASKG03.GT1 for editing, it would come back TASKG03.TG1, to which I'd be expected to respond to with TASKG03.GT2. I think I even sent her the wrong file once (or twice).:-)