>>Hi all:
>>This was an idea a while ago that received good feedback... with VFP coming out of VS, a slight name change to VFP++ might do a lot to attract more serious attention. Whether or not it is completely technically accurate or not is besides the point...If there is one thing that is true, is marketing makes the product not the product itself... if the higher ups saw this desigination on the product it could help its visibility...
>>
>>Thoughts?
>
>I think we first need to add the '++' operator to vfp if we take that road <g>. (and frankly, I would love to see that operator added)


Why a '++' designator? Reminds me too much of another ms product: VJ++. Do you really want that type of designation placed on VFP?

I don't really have a good name change for VFP but I don't think "VFP++" would work too well.

Just my .005 worth. *G*