>Hi Andy,
>
>I was running some test on VFP 5 vs VFP 6 because my client found that 6 was much slower when using SQL. After much testing of different versions on different machines with different environments (WIN 98, Win 2000 Prof, NT WkSt and NT Server) I concluded that the difference was: Version 6 is much slower if you don't have a DELETED() Tag in your .CDX and use Set Deleted ON. It didn't seem to make much difference in VFP 5. Hope this helps. There may be some of my questions/answers in the "search" area.
>
>Paige


Uh Oh!!

I have a largish (40-50 terminals) system running under VFP 5.0. I've been thinking I should upgrade to VFP 6.0. I would hate to see the processing slowdown.

Have you tried compiling VFP 5.0 under Win2K? I'm getting about 4-6 C5 errors a day just working with the builder.

Peter Robinson