>>Me!?!? I've always been a proponent of "the right tool for the job".
>>
>>People shouldn't read too much into what I've said. It should be taken at face value. Namely: Do I want VFP to disappear? No! Do I worry about it? No! Do I hope that MS makes some improvements in their marketing of the product (both internally and externally)? Yes! Going much beyond this probably won't be accurate.
>
>Understood, and agreed on all points here. Mostly just giving you a hard time. :-)

I knew that< s >, but see below.

>But as I posted to James, I really like VFP, always have, but it'll not rule over me. :-)

Same here. One of the reasons that I replied the way I did was that this can be a touchy subject for some (receipiant excluded). Folks can let their emotions speak where they shouldn't. I didn't want this to "get out of hand".