Hello

When the user edits are you doing a rlock()?

>I have a form with a table that can have records added or edited. The table is a fox 2.6 table and the form is VFP 6.0. I am using optimistic buffering. Sometimes, when a user updates a record, another record in the table is overwritten with the values of the record the user was editing. I am using no scatters/gathers. I am letting the buffering handle controling the updates of
>values using tableupdate()/tablerevert(). Is it possible for the pointer to move without foxpro automatically doing a table update? What could be causing this to happen?