>>>>>As said, it looks like a very good idea.
>>>>>
>>>>>Vlad
>>>>
>>>>IThinkItIsAGoodIdeaTolc
>>>>
>>>>:)
>>>it would probably better as :
>>>IThinkItIsAGoodIdea_lc
>>>
>>>so that the scope etc. would stand out - when it is prefix , you se it
>>>immediately because it is lower case (and the first significant letter is
>>>capitalized)but when it is a suffix you need something else
>>>
>>>IAC the advantage of the "Hungarian notation" is that it is somewhat of a
>>>standard, but other than that suffix are better
>>>
>>>btw in FP2.x it is probably better to use suffixes (vs.. prefixes) as FP2.x
>>>ignored long names and you wasted significant letters for a prefix
>>>
>>>Arnon
>>
>>wow_lc=.T. (looks at 10+ pages of app design and ponders briefly) glad I havent started much coding yet, I really like this... especially since it makes more sense.
>>
>>2 cents-R-Us,
>>=D) Rox
>
>would that be
>
>wow_ll = .t. && logical value...
>
>of course, putting scope and type on left make finding public vars left by another programmer easier to find...

=D) ooops... so It make a little while for begin thinking reverse hungarian notation. -Rox