Hey Juan,
SQL = SQL Server?
It really depends on what you're trying to do and the environment. SQL Server is a lot better to work with for homogenous Windows environments because it scales up and down really well
in that environment. It's also less expensive to DB2. And, I believe, it benchmarks as faster than DB2.
OTOH, DB2 runs on a much, much larger number of operating systems. I know of one location where they have a DB2 database that replicates in and out of OS/390, AS/400, and NT fairly seamlessly (requires expensive IBM add-ons, though).
>We are working in a new project. My idea always has been to use SQL but a guy is trying to sell the idea to my boss that DB2 is better. Some comments? Wellcome
------------------------------------------------
John Koziol, ex-MVP, ex-MS, ex-FoxTeam. Just call me "X"
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" - Hunter Thompson (Gonzo) RIP 2/19/05