Barbara,

I thought Michel might have a problem, but I should have known I could count on YOU to find the answer!

It sure had me wondering! (but I didn't think to even use the MAP, so a stick-pin to me!)

Cheers (and thanks)
Jim N

>Jim, I'm not answering for Michel about how messages print, but I think you missed a fact or 2. Frank posted 2 messages on Tuesday & on Thursday, with identical titles, covering the same problem. I didn't realize this until I looked for my reply on the MAP and it was 'missing', since it was actually on the other thread.
>
>Barbara
>
>>Michel Fournier << I HOPE YOU READ THIS >>
>>
>>
>>Michel,
>>Frank had an INITIAL MESSAGE with this title 5 messages ABOVE where this one appeared on the list (the intervening messages were all regarding "Invalid Seek Offset".
>>
>>So this message (quoted in its entirety below) was the second message on this topic.
>>
>>Yet, as you can see, Frank is ANSWERING Edward. This of course means that Edward has a message in here SOMEWHERE.
>>
>>My question is:. . How come the messages are *NOT* IN ORDER?????
>>
>>This makes me feel that possibly I "lose" messages, and that would be a catastrophe for me on UT!
>>
>>Regards,
>>Jim N