>What about "dbc!tablename." At that point, you should be able to know what >table you're working with, and since its a DBC table the fields should be >available for listing without having the table open and look at them. That >would be better than nothing, IMO.

Mike, have you played with FoxCode? You should definitely try some of these concepts in there and see what happens. From what I understand, the way we did it in the command window works this way because of a DBC or open table though. I will think about this one and pass it on to people here.

Let me know if you've tried it!

- Ricardo