>Not again! (just kidding, u know i like debating with u :))
<s>


>Of course ease of use is one of the main GUI tasks, and so
>low re-learling is as well. IMHO, if your're realistic
>about the way computers-software are evolving you *must*
>realize that hardly your users will not have to deal
>with a great variety of applications, ie. text editors,
>browsers, anti-virus, etc., no matter your application
>is what they use mainly.

i recomend u read Alan Cooper's book "about face" (btw, Alan is considered the father of VB or maybe i shouldn't mention this in a fox forum <s>)
about User Interface design - he is more radical then me on this subject(imagine that <s>)

m

>What is MMI anyway u acronym master :) ?
Man Machine Interface - in the army we used to call that HMI
(human etc.) - as it is more politically correct <s>


>really, i don't see the need of this difference,
>aplications that should sell off-the-shelf must be
>the most interested in the easy of use, so why don't
>build your applications thinking that way?

what fits like a glove in certain places might be
totlay wrong for others - thus IMHO u must use something that will be the lesser evil to all

Arnon