Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
A good naming convention for fields
Message
From
11/04/2001 22:02:08
Jonathan Cochran
Alion Science and Technology
Maryland, United States
 
 
To
11/04/2001 15:18:29
Gerry Schmitz
GHS Automation Inc.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00472294
Message ID:
00494724
Views:
27
Probably a dumb question, but here goes...

Who or what are SAP and BAAN?

>>I really agree with your comment about searching through the code. If you have a field named just "id", there is essentially no way to search through your code for it. If you have a small project, that is fine. We have a really large project and field names that are short or are common letter groupings such as "id" are basically impossible to search for because you get too many matches with other words.
>>
>
>Exactly, Jonathan. The "Field Name" is more like a "key"; if we want something more "friendly" to present to the outside world, there are other ways. Most Report Writers (like Crystal Reports) have facilities that allow one to map "our" Field and Table Names to "friendly" User names that help facilitate User report writing.
>
>We're in good company; SAP and BAAN maintain literally thousands of tables and they do it with short, unique field names.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform