>>
>>Thanks Ricardo, please consider it for SP1, for some of us having some multi-treading capacity directly from VFP is really important.
>
>
>Again, I will speak, and again not for the Fox team, but this is based on past experience and announcements. SPs are to fix bugs. New functionality is not supposed to be introduced. Now, if the Fox team states that not having mutli-threaded capabilities in VFP is a bug, then you may see it in an SP. Otherwise, you'll have to wait until VFP8. Ricardo.. am I correct?

Craig,

I think part of the problem (of what people expect out of an SP) may have been caused by VFP 6.0 SP3. What was introduced there (the Session class, for example) normally wouldn't have come in an SP, but rather a minor version number upgrade. Of course, I, too, am speaking strictly from experience.