>No that is definitely worth a point... *smile*

I thank you sir.

>Plus, I probably won't lose much time since the INSERTs will all be a hair faster without the need to index.

With 2.3 million records I think the performance on INSERTing without indexes will be much faster than "a hair" (especially considering that you said you had a "goodly number" of indexes in the file).

Best...

--Brad