>>>>>I'm not sure what MS thought was the problem with the minor version numbering system, but at some point, they discarded it- at least for Dev Tools. Now that there is no such thing at MS as version 6.5, they had no choice but to put minor upgrades into a Service Pack. The change in semantics is silly if you ask me, and is one more reason that all marketing people should be tarred and feathered.
>>>>
>>>>Erik;
>>>>
>>>>VFP 5.0 and VFP 5.0a come to mind.
>>>
>>>Exactly my point. What makes is an '0a' instead of an '01'?
>>
>>Actually, 5.0a was a bit incomplete. That was the "name" for two different builds (412 & 415).
>
>Three builds, actually. :-( 402 was the first 5.0a build.

Must have missed that one. Don't think I ever saw it.