>>Despite your last 2 not really being direct product improvement items (though they sure are product SURVIVAL items), I've decided to keep any lists provided by anyone to see what might be learned from them.
>>
>>If enough come in I'll provide some kind of summary.
>
>1) Better Windows API support (eg. native support for "Structures").
>
>2) A "native compiler", or at least a new/better way to encrypt our source.
>
>(Sorry ... but I despise companies like Refox that live off the sweat of others).
>
>3) "Two-way" programming.

That's 4 lists. Maybe there will be something to 'process' after all.