>>>Its all implementation, and 'm sure someone else can come up with a better one than I, but does it make sense why it would be wrong? We we need OO Datasources, and eventually tables?
>>
>>
>>I'm not sure want an OO database. I've seen the pains going on here that people have to do to move from Pervasive to SQL Server. It isn't pretty.
>
>An object database and object-based access to a database are completely different things. See: SQLDMO, ADO.


Yup, you're right. I was reading things into it that weren't there.