>>I would like to know the 'quality' of the Index and, more particularly, the .CHM file. I have yet to find one that comes close to the one with Hacker's.
>
>Hi Jim,
>
>Are you saying you LIKE the Hacker's index? It is my biggest complaint of the book. I want to look at INDEXSEEK(), for instance. Hmmm, page 541. Great. I go to page 541 and what do I get - See Seek. Back to the index again. Horrible.

I find the Hackers guide CHM brilliant - most of the time I use it instead of MSDN library (as for the book - I never touch it) I assumed that was what Jim N was talking about