Good, I see we're understanding each other now..

Seriously, I'm just taking exception to your generalization of VB programmers.

I really think you're saying that just to put VB down and not because you have made an objective evaluation of both tools that lead you to believe VB is for dummies.

>Ok J. Crescencio Flores, you're right, i am wrong.
>
>with Best Regards
>
>Francisco Morosini
>
>>So what? I can create a simple application using wizards and little code if any in VFP. What does that make VFP programmers in your view?
>>
>>Be it VB or VFP it still takes a good degree of knowledge to build a solid application. And in reality any language has support for bad programmers if you think about it.
>>
>>>VB is a easy language to put windows to work, if you need low level you need activex, but VB is a general language, and support bad programming, the VB programmer is the lowest common denominator programmer, because you buy the box and put to work to anyone with little know about program design, the dummies start with VB, why Microsoft change VB to syntax similar to C or Java?, when someone start a learn programming what language choose?, why?.
>>>
>>>i apologize if offend you or anyone, but VB is a mass language, the IT Market preffer VB Programmers because exist 3000000, they dont like VFP because is tiny comunity and are expensive
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Well, I'm a VB user and contrary to what some of my posts may suggest, I don't consider myself a dummy :). There may be a higher newbie-to-expert ratio than with VFP but that does not translate to what you are saying.
>>>>
>>>>And the comments below seem to come from a less than informed VB programmer. Like the saying goes, it's the fiddler..