>Thanks, George.
>
>I should have tried the acronyms too, not just the dictionary.
>
>>By the way, I'd like to see simple structures (no embedded pointers) at least too. I think, Larry's hit the reasons.
>
>I'm happy with that, and I can say that at the moment we are at least three wanting structures in VFP: Larry, you and me (maybe Alex, then four) :-)
>
>Do you think it could be a good idea to open a thread about that, to check the feasibility of VFP having structures? (if it has not been done in the past)
>
>Regards,
>
Fernando,

I could name a number of people, besides the one's you've listed, who would like to see at least simple structures.

It has been gone over before, but there's no reason why not to do it again. So if you so wish, start a thread.< s >