>Here's a quote from a recent thread:
>

loColumn.DynamicFontBold = "'IIF(THIS.PARENT.gnRecNo = RECNO THIS.PARENT.RecordSource), .T., .F.)'"

>I wouldn't be starting on this if this was the only one, but I'm seeing the IIf({expL}, .T., .F.) just far too often, so I started wondering what made this become customary.

>Is it just my pet peeve, or are there some recommendations about this?

I've seen variations on this in code I have to maintain. I tend not to do it but I can understand how seeing the .T.,.F. makes the code slightly more readable.

One place where I think this extra clarity is worthwhile is a variant of one of your examples.

c = IIF(a = b,.T.,.F.)

rather than

c = a = b

since someone where Fox is not a primary language (probably more true in the 2.6 world) could look at that as

STORE b TO a,c

.......Rich