Hi Peter,

(also thanks to Dragan for his suggestion)

Thanks for the reply. I did some tests and it seems that I can do this easily enough. Still, it's an annoying limitation (like the stupid 255 char SQL statement garbage - argh!) and one MS should've "fixed".

Does anyone know of/have to share a pageframe class that incorporates scroll bars? There's another feature I'd like to see in VFP[next].

-Arne

>Arne,
>
>In a former version we used *very* long (so vertical scroll) forms with hundreds of objects; only PC's with 300 Mhz or less don't scroll smoothly. And yes, the jump can of course (by itself) be used. If the Mhz is allright I can promise you it all works fine. BTW, I don't think there is so much difference from VFP's (6) internal redraw, since you yourself don't do that much of a difference; the form just is there completely, but the visible area is tightened. Of course you have to set it up with the proper containers.
>IMO this is not that ugly at all and for sure we won't use the formal Scroll of VFP6 ever, because it has too many limitations. But that's another subject. I only want to emphasize on the happy I am with this solution.
>
>Putting it all in (dynamically created) pageframes of course is much more neat. We do that too (try do that with formal vertical scrollbar; it's just not satisfying).
>
>Good luck with all,
>Peter