Hi!

Yes. Otherwise you will require to use tableupdate() for table too. Better do not mess with it because this can cause also other effect.

Well, I prposed to use the 5-th buffering only for test to see the real flow of actions in the browse windows without automatic updates. However, in application 5-th buffering takes more memory for buffering and works more slowly, as well as it requires to can for changes using the GetNextModified() function. Use third buffering where possible. When you do not move record pointer on the form for duration of record editing, automatic update will not happen. If alias in grid or browse window - this happens as usual.

HTH.

>Right I think I am getting somewhere!
>
>I have had both table and view bufferng set to 5 and in my save method tableupdating the view and then depending on the success tableupdating the table.
>
>Are you saying that I should not buffer the base table and just tableupdate the view?