>>1. Add updated (to conform with OS upgrades) VFP drivers back to MDAC!! If MS can support dbase, and text. then they should support their own VFP product.
>
>It has nothing to do with "supporting" VFP. Being a Windows component takes a
lot of bandwidth. Every time we release a Windows SP, it has to be tested on 20 different languages, and each component is responsible for their own testing. There's no conspiracy, just not enough hours in the day.
>
Does this translate to: "The Fox team did not have enough time to include or provide drivers for the latest version of MDAC? The reason being that VFP consumes too much bandwidth?
>Check out the white papers we'll be shipping on the CD. Christine even wrangled me into writing one. She claims I committed to it in Orlando, which possibly explains why she was buying the beer that night. :-)
I will be looking for it, It should be an interesting read, depending on the quantity of suds comsumed. <eg>
MSCE, MCSP, Microsoft Channel Partner
Relax, Boss. We will meet the deadline! What? You want to add MORE? What do you mean, Over Budget?
Opinions and comments are the sole responsibility of the sender, and accuracy, correctness, or pertinence is considered coincidental.
