There's a lot more problems with the code that just being old. And CU is a waste of money. I don't have time right now to really get into this, but I will say that there's plenty of unfair treatment coming from the other direction.

As to what we're doing, we do mods for people with Pro/VP and also do 3rd party add-ons.

Michelle


>We still have clients using SBT products on DOS (y2k is fixed). I understand from a good friend that 6.5 has many improvements in the base coding and will use database containers. I haven't seen this yet (I'm not a beta tester nor did I attend the accpac conference) but expect to see it sometime in July. Over all I think many programmers are not treating SBt/Accpac fairly. Accpac/SBT can't just rewrite very module just because new (and yes better) features are available in the lastest version of fox. They can't just change the underlining tables because this would cause havoc will custom (third party) programs. Last year SBT came out with the customization module - it works and at the time many thought it was great. Now people are upset because SBT does not support SQL. So I guess there is no pleasing this crowd. What are you guys doing with the product?
>John