>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>I don't know how to improve the system, but my problem is that the original poster doesn't always mark the message. What this means is that sometimes correct responses will go unmarked, while others will. What I'm saying is, just because a person has lots of points, doesn't mean that people with fewer points is not contributing just as many correct answers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>And looking at so-and-so having plenty of points certainly says that they gave many correct responses, but not having many points does not say the opposite; only that they were quicker on the draw. Many times I did not respond because it would've been a repetition of the same answers. It's hard to get stars when some people seem to live at the UT (and fighting for the quickest response time). {g}

Yup. that's one more reason I see the thing as flawed.