Doug,
>1. I doubt seriously there is any chance of such a MS annouoncement. And lessening of VFP use will come from lack of interest in the developer arena IMHO.
Exactly! But I do not thing there is a lessening of interest. A lesening of visibility perhaps but I remain convinced that Microsoft will get this right.
>
>2. Your plan outline below is exactly the same as the one I am following at present, so it cannot be all bad! <eg>
Riiiigghhtt.. That settles it then. <g>
>
>
>
>>
>>Well, that' skind of why I asked. <g> I
suppose if MSFT suddenly announced the end of VFP I still think we'd have a few years of transition time.
>>
>>Now, let me quickly remind everyone that the folks at MSFT have announced they are already working on VFP8, which should continue the great work they are doing now.
>>
>>In my own case, and since it's only fair I also answer the same question I asked you <g>, I'd most likely immediately start learning the following products.
>>
>>1) SQL Server - Why> Money, leveraging current knowledge.
>>
>>2) Oracle - Not for the interface <g> but for the $$ & leverage of knowledge.
>>
>>3) VB - Why not? Strength in numbers. OK product but lacking local data management strengths of VFP.
>>
>>4) Delphi/Kylix - Investment in the future on the desktop.
>>
>>Essentially leverage 16+ years of desktop data management.
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.