Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
(urgent) Win98 ScanDisk spoiled Win2000 NTFS5
Message
From
18/06/2001 06:54:49
 
 
To
All
General information
Forum:
Windows
Category:
Troubleshooting
Title:
(urgent) Win98 ScanDisk spoiled Win2000 NTFS5
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00520502
Message ID:
00520502
Views:
48
Hi!

Here is another funny trouble story.
I have 2 HDD, 1 with Win2000 (1-st, NTFS5) and another with Win98 (2-nd, FAT32). I always worked with Win2000 and used Win98 disk as a floppy to poll data back and forth from the office to home.

Recently I have to use both operation systems on the same computer to test some new softaware. So I put Win2000 HDD as C drive and Win98 as a D drive and switch in BIOS which one should boot. When I boot Win98, it runs autmatic scandisk at startup to check the Win2000 HDD for errors (because it is new). I always 'Alt-X' it without aware how that simple thing could be dangerous... Once I left Win98 starting up and went to, say, drink some coffee. When I come back, scandisk already made its dark work - it finished at 85% by Alt-X. After that Win2000 stopped to boot. When I look to the scandisk.log file, I saw that it made a copy of the 2-nd FAT (copy of the FAT) on the NTFS drive! Than truncated some suspicious FAT entries... In other words, @^%#$^@#, it spoiled the bood drive with Win2000.

Noew there are the questions:
1. Does Win98 automatic scandisk makes a backup of what it does and is there a way to recover the problem by reverse (undo) actions that scandisk made?
2. Can I recover my Win2000 drive information? If partially (5-10%), it is ok.
3. How can I switch off Win98 automatic scandisk running?
4. Does Win2000 have an ability to boot with menu where I can select what operation system I want to start, so I will not run BIOS setup each time when I want to switch to another OS on another drive?
Vlad Grynchyshyn, Project Manager, MCP
vgryn@yahoo.com
ICQ #10709245
The professional level of programmer could be determined by level of stupidity of his/her bugs

It is not appropriate to say that question is "foolish". There could be only foolish answers. Everybody passed period of time when knows nothing about something.
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform