> You're correct. It does not protect, it just tells Refox about willing of protect that is not a protection.

> In the Message #512733:

> If the technology you going to hide costs more than expences on the decompiling, your program probably will be decompiled. When it costs less, you do not require to worry about.

>That is the main point in any hacking/protection from hacking (and decompilation in particular).

Since no protection, a user can hack and know the encrpytion of data & password to the server.... wish i was working in a bank :)